From a Doctor's Perspective

The following comes from David, B. Wilhelm, MD. He wrote concerning the churches’ deciding to suspend services. David’s father, Jack Wilhelm, was a longtime gospel preacher.

Dr. David Wilhelm wrote:

"Since I know many people are struggling with the concept of "missing church services," let me say I understand. I grew up as a preacher's kid in Alabama in the 1970's, so believe me. I understand. "But allow me to offer a little perspective on the common ground where science and scripture intersect, giving us direction in our decision making during this time of anxiety.

Remember that Jehovah God was and is a God of quarantine in times of illness, even before we had the ability to understand why.

Numbers 5:2 outlines an isolation protocol for lepers and those who contacted a dead body.

Leviticus 14:36 states those with infection were labeled unclean and sent to live outside the camp.

Leviticus 13:4 gives directions for dealing with apparent staph skin infections, before anyone could have possibly known what that was.

The bottom line is, God knew the value of quarantine and gave us no less than 16 examples of when this is appropriate. It is certainly not unscriptural to follow His blueprint and take steps to ensure our physical health and safety, regardless of our religious beliefs.

Please be safe people. And remember, the quarantine may not ultimately change the number of viral infections, but it may spread them out long enough to keep our hospitals from being overrun with more patients than we can handle.”

Closing Church

Suspending church services in the face of an epidemic is NOT a new concept. Here’s what they did in 1918/1919 [when the Spanish Flu in nine months killed an estimated 675,000 in the United States, and in the world an estimate anywhere from 50 -100 million. BFV]:

J. C. McQuiddy, “Closing Churches,” Gospel Advocate (October 24, 1918), p. 1020-1, responding to the government order to cease public gatherings, including church services, during the 1918 influenza epidemic.

“But Christians have not felt that God required them to meet upon the first day of the week when any of their family or loved ones were seriously sick. Especially they have not felt called upon to leave them and meet with the disciples on the first day of the week if thereby they would jeopardize the lives of members of not only their families, but the families also of many other people. With this view of it, which is in harmony with the practice of Christians, I have suggested to the brethren who asked me about observing the command of the government that they should do so, suggesting, however, that they could meet in their homes or simply a few in some place and thereby obey the government, which we should always do, provided such obedience is not disobedience to God. . . For Christians to urge that we should now assemble in large crowds to break bread in the face of the proclamation of the government is not warranted by the Scriptures . . . It will not be questioned that the intent of the government is to protect and care for the lives of its subjects. As the observance of the command does not interfere with Christians’ meeting a few together and observing the Lord’s Supper, Christians should observe the command cheerfully, seeking to lead quiet, holy, and unblameable lives.”

Meeting in Our Homes

The Mayor of Indianapolis has placed travel restrictions on those in Marion County, Indiana.  All non-essential travel is discouraged.  The Federal Government has recommended that no group of more than ten gather. These restrictions and recommendations are given to try to slow down the coronavirus that is affecting people in this country. This is especially beneficial to the 60 and older group who may or may not have underlying health issues. It is also to encouraged that the younger people try not to be carriers of that which may harm others.   

Even if these recommendations are changed to restrictive laws, should Christians violate these laws? Do these laws go contrary to God’s law to assemble with the saints on the Lord’s day? We certainly ought to obey God rather than man (Acts 5:29). But if these recommendations are made laws, would Christians be wrong to violate them in order to assemble? 

First, Christians are commanded to meet together to worship on the Lord’s day. However, Christians can still meet in small groups of fewer than ten to carry out the command to assemble. Some early churches met in the homes of individuals to worship (Acts 12:12; Rom. 16:3-5; 1 Cor. 16:19). The recommendation/law does not prohibit Christians from assembling to worship in small groups. If it did, then we would have to obey heaven’s law rather than man’s law.  A small group can carry out all the acts of worship – singing, praying, studying, observing the Lord’s supper and giving just as the Lord teaches.  We hope that this arrangement does not last long, but we do not know. 

Second, the observance of meeting in groups of ten or fewer is practicing the Golden Rule
(Matt. 7:12). In consideration of my brothers and sisters in Christ and my fellowman, I should not gather in a large crowd (John 13:34-35). If I were a carrier of the virus and did not know it, I could pass it on to someone else who has underlying health issues and cause him or her to contract the virus. Out of love for my fellowman, I should be responsible enough to avoid being in a large crowd or traveling when not necessary (Matt. 22:39). 

Third, it is rendering “unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s; and unto to God the
things that are God’s” to observe these recommendations (Matt. 22:21). We are to be subject unto the powers that be (Rom. 13:1-7). The government, having been ordained of God, is for the punishment of evil doers and the praise of them who do well (1 Peter 2:14). In this case, it is for our good that we adhere to the recommendations of the government. 

Fourth, John wrote, “Beloved, I wish above all things that thou mayest prosper and be in health, even as thy soul prospereth.” (3 John 2.) John was concerned for the overall being of Gaius – his fiscal well-being, his physical well-being and his spiritual well-being. We, also, should be concerned for every member of the body of Christ, especially the family of God at Shelbyville Road here in Indianapolis. During these trying times, we encourage all members to keep in touch with each other by whatever means one has at his disposal. The writer of Hebrews said, “But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin” (Heb. 3:13.)

Fifth, there were trying circumstances for those Christians in the early years of the church. Due to persecutions, they had to meet secretly or privately. In fact, today in China it against the law for Christians to meet; so, they have to meet secretly to carry out the Lord’s will.  Paul said, “I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me” (Phil. 4:13.)  With Lord’s help, we can get through this. Often men leading prayers in our assemblies will thank our heavenly Father for our being able to assemble without fear of molestation or attack.  We pray that soon we can again express our thanks for the Lord’s allowing us to come together as God’s family at Shelbyville Road.  Pray for our country, and that this virus might be defeated. Pray for every member of the household of faith.  Pray for the sick that God’s healing hand will be with them. Keep in touch. 

What Some In The World Say About The Prom

 Last week’s article entitled, “What the Bible Says About the Prom” was carried on the church’s Facebook page, and there were 2,225 reached by it.  It was beyond my comprehension the number of individuals, including gospel preachers, who took exception to it, defending the right of Christians’ attending the prom.  This is just another example of the worldliness that has infiltrated the Lord’s church. This reaction tells me that there is a need to do more preaching and teaching against dancing. As a follow up to that article, I want to simply quote some statements from a few in the world.  These quotes are not from members of the church of Christ, as far as I know.   

Just a little over four years ago, on September 24, 2011, a letter to the editor of The Indianapolis Star appeared.  I am carrying it in its entirety.  I regret having to print it in The Informer, because it uses such explicit language; however, many parents, grandparents, preachers and elders are naive as to what takes place at school dances. It is a crying shame that such has to be even discussed in a public forum as this.  The apostle Paul wrote that it was a shame even to speak of those things which are done of some in secret.  Such is a far cry from our present age. Such things are done publicly and there is no shame to talk about them publicly.  Nothing is considered taboo.  People, even brethren, will discuss openly matters which a generation ago would not have been broached.  Someone says, “Well, you are just old fashioned.”  Yes, I am, and I wish we could turn back the clock when it comes to some matters.  

Missed Chance to Dial Down Sexual Heat

As a chaperone on the Carmel High School homecoming dance floor, I was saddened by our missed opportunity as adults to positively shape the future of these kids.  The environment emulated a nightclub, and through the collective silence of everyone in authority, a highly sexualized experience was endorsed.

Students received written rules when they purchased their tickets, but the accountability provided was insufficient to combat the behavior that has become culturally acceptable.

My wife and I observed girls pole dancing around the decorative trees on the floor; a girl was passed among six guys who seductively held and thrust at her from behind; and there was dancing that simulated intercourse through clothing.  I was told to shine my light only “if things became really inappropriate…like girls hiking their dresses up over their panties” and so the thrusting and pumping among the vast majority of students continued.  This was not limited to isolated groups of students. 

While this level of promiscuity is not unique to Carmel, parents need to be made aware that homecoming has become an inappropriate, provocative atmosphere.  Carmel’s recent experience with sexual misconduct necessitates greater vigilance in the oversight of school-sanctioned events.

We may not have much control over the culture outside our walls, but we can set expectations that uphold a higher standard.  A word of leadership from the administration to the kids, a little less darkness and volume, more variety of music, and greater employment of the chaperones may have provided the boundaries our kids so desperately need.

We missed a fantastic opportunity to be different from our sexualized culture and instead we nurtured it.

                                                                       --Andy E. Miller

                                                                          Zionsville

In the same year, 2011, Focus, the student newspaper of Perry Meridian High School in Indianapolis, carried an article by Alex Witten, a staff member of the paper, entitled, “Teens Dancing to New Beats.”  It discussed the evolution of dancing from the 60’s to the present.  Witten wrote:

Popular dance has long struggled to find a balance between simple group fun and sexuality. The moves seen in the 1987 film Dirty Dancing, reflecting the dance era of 1963 were considered highly provocative at the time. Flashing forward, many movers and shakers in today’s society would consider the dancing in Dirty Dancing remarkably clean.  What happened in between to lead to today’s “Jerk,” “Dougie” and “grinding?” – most commonly seen at Prom.

After several quotes from teachers who had noticed changes, Witten continued:

While every teacher asked found the commonly seen homecoming/prom “grinding” to be vulgar, two PM students chose to defend it.  Senior Bianca Cotter and junior Brett Timmons explain that while “grinding” is not their only choice of dancing, they still enjoy it.  Cotter and Timmons, who both found it difficult to describe what “grinding” is, opted to use similes.  Cotter says, “It’s like two palm trees (the boy and girl) swaying in the wind while being as close together as peanut butter and jelly.”  Timmons says, “It’s like a ham and cheese sandwich.  The bread is the crowd, the ham is the guy, and the cheese is the girl.  Everyone is just moving really close together.”

In Witten’s opening paragraph he referred to an article entitled, “Why Do We Like to Dance – And Move to the Beat” in which the author explained that our brains respond to “coordinated movements.”  Witten then wrote, “This means that whether we are watching or performing, the reward area of our brain is stimulated by dancing. Dancing can make us laugh, smile and brighten our mood.”  This tells me that whether one is participating or is a spectator, he will be influenced by the dancing.  

Now, a reminder and a question:  Remember the meaning of the word lasciviousness (KJV) or lewdness (NKJV) that translates a Greek word (a)sevlgeia) which means:  “unbridled lust, excess, licentiousness, lasciviousness, wantonness, outrageousness, shamelessness, insolence…wanton (acts or) manners, as filthy words, indecent physical movements, unchaste handling of males and female.” (Thayer's Greek Lexicon.)  Here’s the question:  Does not the descriptions of present day dancing at homecomings and proms as given above by a chaperon and students apply to the word lasciviousness or lewdness?

I have been in correspondence with a gospel preacher who has asked me if it were possible for a Christian couple to attend the prom without sinning.  First, I am appalled that a gospel preacher would even attempt to justify such action. Second, why would anyone trying to follow Christ go to such a place, based on the above description of the dancing done at proms now?  He said that he was one who was influenced to become a Christian at the prom. He surely is the exception. I am not arguing the exception, but the rule. Paul said to avoid every form of evil. The prom is evil as depicted above.  Therefore, one should avoid the prom.  Now, avoid does not mean see how close you can get to it.  I am wondering if the brother would be comfortable going to the prom now?  Brethren, there are some places that are to be avoided after one becomes a Christian.  Peter wrote of the Christian “…that he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men, but to the will of God. For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles, when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries: Wherein they think it strange that ye run not with them to the same excess of riot, speaking evil of you.” (1 Peter 4:2-4.)

If for the sake of argument, I grant that the prom is a parallel to the eating of meats offered an idol (that is, it is in the realm of judgment), would it be wise to go to a place where you might cause another to stumble?  Did not Paul address this issue?

But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak. For if any man see thee which hast knowledge sit at meat in the idol's temple, shall not the conscience of him which is weak be emboldened to eat those things which are offered to idols; And through thy knowledge shall the weak brother perish, for whom Christ died? But when ye sin so against the brethren, and wound their weak conscience, ye sin against Christ. Wherefore, if meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend. (1 Corinthians 8:9-13.)

Brethren, let me urge all Christians to oppose dancing.  Let preachers preach against it; let elders uphold their hands in opposition to it.  Let us strive to be lights in a world of darkness.   

Think on these things.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                        The Informer

                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Vol. 68 No. 31

                                                                                                                                                                                                                        May 17, 2015

What the Bible Says About the Prom

 

I am aware that there are young people who every spring attend what is called the prom.  A few of these young people claim to follow Jesus Christ.  They were baptized into Christ and attend the services of the church regularly; yet I hear of their having gone to the prom with some handsome young man or some pretty girl.  Even some adults who long ago were taught differently see nothing wrong with their going to a dance.  More and more I am hearing of weddings in which both bride and groom claim to be Christians, but will have a dance at their wedding reception. So, what does the Bible say about the prom and other occasions where there is dancing?

One can read his Bible from the table of contents to the maps and will find not one time the word prom is used.  I do not even think it can be found in the modern versions which are out there.  So, how can one say that the Bible condones or condemns the custom of young people’s going to the prom in the spring? After all, do not the schools sponsors such activities?  Are not they chaperoned by teachers and adults? 

Let us think for a moment on this matter.  Does the Bible have to specifically condemn an action in order for it to be condemned?  For instance, does the Bible say that the use of heroine is wrong?  Does the Bible specifically say that it is sinful for a girl to wear a bikini at the beach or other public places?  Does the Bible specifically say that it is sinful to drink Jack Daniels or some other kind of whiskey?  We can answer with a resounding NO to each of these questions; however that does not make the action acceptable to God. 

The Bible is a book of principles.  Just think how large the book would be if it specifically mentioned all of the things one should not do.  Why the world could not contain the whole.  So, back to question:  What does the Bible say about the prom or other dances?

There is one word in the New Testament which condemns the prom.  The apostle Paul wrote to the churches of Galatia these words:

This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh. For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would. But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law. Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. (Gal. 5 16-21).

I put in bold and in italics the word I would like for you to consider.  The word is translated from the Greek word ἀσέλγεια which is defined as “unbridled lust, excess, licentiousness, lasciviousness, wantonness, outrageousness, shamelessness, insolence….wanton (acts or) manners, as filthy words, indecent physical movements, unchaste handling of males and females, etc.” (Thayer's Greek Lexicon.) Another source defines the word as “unrestrained living, unbridled acts of indecency which shock the public.” (Rienecker and Rogers, Linguistic Key to the Greek New Testament, p. 517.)  These are enough to show that the prom fits under the definition of the word lasciviousness. Why would a godly girl want a boy to put his hands all over her?  Why would a young Christian man want to put himself in such a vulnerable position?

Immodesty also accompanies the prom.  Dresses that are strapless, low-cut in front and/or back, a long slit up the side of the dress, etc. do not depict a woman’s professing godliness with good works.  Paul told the young man Timothy “Keep thyself pure.” (I Tim. 5:22.)  That is not easy in this modern age.  The word pure means “pure from carnality, chaste, modest; pure from every fault, immaculate.” (Strong’s Dictionary.)  How can a man keep his mind pure under such circumstances?  If he is normal, he cannot. Yet Jesus said, “But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.”  (Matt. 5:28).  Someone says:  “Well, he should not have such thoughts.”  No doubt; but men more so than women, are aroused sexually by what they see. And the world knows this. And women know this. So women are advertising.   

So, ladies, what are you advertising?  What do men see when they see you?  Do they see godliness, purity and Christian virtue?  Or do they see a woman dressed as a harlot (Gen. 38:14-15; Prov. 7:10).  Why then would a young lady, claiming to be a Christian, want to cause a man to have such thoughts?  She is partly to blame for his sin. That does not relieve him, but it certainly condemns her too.   

It is argued that there are adult chaperones at the prom.  Certainly, but they are carnal.  They have no interest in spiritual matters or they would not be there. Even when there are adults present, they find it impossible to control the indecent bodily movements of the attendees.  Almost fifteen years ago there was a term used called “freaking” or grinding defined as “a type of partner dance where two or more individuals gyrate their bodies against each other.”  Some schools began to draft”…rules on hand and thrust placement (like ‘no bending past a 45 degree angle’ at Wash. state’s Puyallup H.S.). ‘Not all freaking is banned’ at Santa Cruz (Calif.) High, just ‘sexually explicit dancing.’ That clears it all up.” (Newsweek, March 19, 2001, p. 8.) A few years ago at the middle school where my wife taught, the principal stopped all school dances, because the kids were so vulgar in their dancing. This was middle school!  I applauded that principal.  Too bad we do not have more of his kind. 

One of the saddest things about our young people’s going to the proms and dances is that parents encourage it!  Can you believe that?  Absolutely.  When I started my first local work in northern Indiana, I preached a blistering sermon against dancing, specifically against one’s going to the prom.  A young man came forward and confessed wrong.  He had planned to go to the prom; but after my lesson, he changed his mind.  However when he got home, his parents, who claimed to be Christians, encouraged him to go.  So, he went. They said that he might be able to influence the girl to become a Christian!  What a joke.  I very seriously doubt that the young man was trying to convert the young lady to Christ while dancing with her.

Someone says, “Well, I am not going to dance; but am going, only as a spectator.”  Yes, Herod was a spectator, too.    Herodias’ daughter danced before him and pleased him.  He was so pleased, he offered up to the half of his kingdom to her. Herodias had told her daughter to ask for the head of John the Baptist.  I wonder what there was about her dancing that caused the old man to be pleased?  If Herod enjoyed the dancing of the young lady, what about young men watching young ladies dance? 

So, Christian young man or lady, do not go to the prom.  The Bible condemns it; your mind and body may be polluted by it; your influence will be hurt by going to it. Do not go; be a Christian.

                                                                                                THE INFORMER

                                                                                                Vol. 68      No. 30

                                                                                                 May 10, 2015