What Some In The World Say About The Prom

 Last week’s article entitled, “What the Bible Says About the Prom” was carried on the church’s Facebook page, and there were 2,225 reached by it.  It was beyond my comprehension the number of individuals, including gospel preachers, who took exception to it, defending the right of Christians’ attending the prom.  This is just another example of the worldliness that has infiltrated the Lord’s church. This reaction tells me that there is a need to do more preaching and teaching against dancing. As a follow up to that article, I want to simply quote some statements from a few in the world.  These quotes are not from members of the church of Christ, as far as I know.   

Just a little over four years ago, on September 24, 2011, a letter to the editor of The Indianapolis Star appeared.  I am carrying it in its entirety.  I regret having to print it in The Informer, because it uses such explicit language; however, many parents, grandparents, preachers and elders are naive as to what takes place at school dances. It is a crying shame that such has to be even discussed in a public forum as this.  The apostle Paul wrote that it was a shame even to speak of those things which are done of some in secret.  Such is a far cry from our present age. Such things are done publicly and there is no shame to talk about them publicly.  Nothing is considered taboo.  People, even brethren, will discuss openly matters which a generation ago would not have been broached.  Someone says, “Well, you are just old fashioned.”  Yes, I am, and I wish we could turn back the clock when it comes to some matters.  

Missed Chance to Dial Down Sexual Heat

As a chaperone on the Carmel High School homecoming dance floor, I was saddened by our missed opportunity as adults to positively shape the future of these kids.  The environment emulated a nightclub, and through the collective silence of everyone in authority, a highly sexualized experience was endorsed.

Students received written rules when they purchased their tickets, but the accountability provided was insufficient to combat the behavior that has become culturally acceptable.

My wife and I observed girls pole dancing around the decorative trees on the floor; a girl was passed among six guys who seductively held and thrust at her from behind; and there was dancing that simulated intercourse through clothing.  I was told to shine my light only “if things became really inappropriate…like girls hiking their dresses up over their panties” and so the thrusting and pumping among the vast majority of students continued.  This was not limited to isolated groups of students. 

While this level of promiscuity is not unique to Carmel, parents need to be made aware that homecoming has become an inappropriate, provocative atmosphere.  Carmel’s recent experience with sexual misconduct necessitates greater vigilance in the oversight of school-sanctioned events.

We may not have much control over the culture outside our walls, but we can set expectations that uphold a higher standard.  A word of leadership from the administration to the kids, a little less darkness and volume, more variety of music, and greater employment of the chaperones may have provided the boundaries our kids so desperately need.

We missed a fantastic opportunity to be different from our sexualized culture and instead we nurtured it.

                                                                       --Andy E. Miller

                                                                          Zionsville

In the same year, 2011, Focus, the student newspaper of Perry Meridian High School in Indianapolis, carried an article by Alex Witten, a staff member of the paper, entitled, “Teens Dancing to New Beats.”  It discussed the evolution of dancing from the 60’s to the present.  Witten wrote:

Popular dance has long struggled to find a balance between simple group fun and sexuality. The moves seen in the 1987 film Dirty Dancing, reflecting the dance era of 1963 were considered highly provocative at the time. Flashing forward, many movers and shakers in today’s society would consider the dancing in Dirty Dancing remarkably clean.  What happened in between to lead to today’s “Jerk,” “Dougie” and “grinding?” – most commonly seen at Prom.

After several quotes from teachers who had noticed changes, Witten continued:

While every teacher asked found the commonly seen homecoming/prom “grinding” to be vulgar, two PM students chose to defend it.  Senior Bianca Cotter and junior Brett Timmons explain that while “grinding” is not their only choice of dancing, they still enjoy it.  Cotter and Timmons, who both found it difficult to describe what “grinding” is, opted to use similes.  Cotter says, “It’s like two palm trees (the boy and girl) swaying in the wind while being as close together as peanut butter and jelly.”  Timmons says, “It’s like a ham and cheese sandwich.  The bread is the crowd, the ham is the guy, and the cheese is the girl.  Everyone is just moving really close together.”

In Witten’s opening paragraph he referred to an article entitled, “Why Do We Like to Dance – And Move to the Beat” in which the author explained that our brains respond to “coordinated movements.”  Witten then wrote, “This means that whether we are watching or performing, the reward area of our brain is stimulated by dancing. Dancing can make us laugh, smile and brighten our mood.”  This tells me that whether one is participating or is a spectator, he will be influenced by the dancing.  

Now, a reminder and a question:  Remember the meaning of the word lasciviousness (KJV) or lewdness (NKJV) that translates a Greek word (a)sevlgeia) which means:  “unbridled lust, excess, licentiousness, lasciviousness, wantonness, outrageousness, shamelessness, insolence…wanton (acts or) manners, as filthy words, indecent physical movements, unchaste handling of males and female.” (Thayer's Greek Lexicon.)  Here’s the question:  Does not the descriptions of present day dancing at homecomings and proms as given above by a chaperon and students apply to the word lasciviousness or lewdness?

I have been in correspondence with a gospel preacher who has asked me if it were possible for a Christian couple to attend the prom without sinning.  First, I am appalled that a gospel preacher would even attempt to justify such action. Second, why would anyone trying to follow Christ go to such a place, based on the above description of the dancing done at proms now?  He said that he was one who was influenced to become a Christian at the prom. He surely is the exception. I am not arguing the exception, but the rule. Paul said to avoid every form of evil. The prom is evil as depicted above.  Therefore, one should avoid the prom.  Now, avoid does not mean see how close you can get to it.  I am wondering if the brother would be comfortable going to the prom now?  Brethren, there are some places that are to be avoided after one becomes a Christian.  Peter wrote of the Christian “…that he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men, but to the will of God. For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles, when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries: Wherein they think it strange that ye run not with them to the same excess of riot, speaking evil of you.” (1 Peter 4:2-4.)

If for the sake of argument, I grant that the prom is a parallel to the eating of meats offered an idol (that is, it is in the realm of judgment), would it be wise to go to a place where you might cause another to stumble?  Did not Paul address this issue?

But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak. For if any man see thee which hast knowledge sit at meat in the idol's temple, shall not the conscience of him which is weak be emboldened to eat those things which are offered to idols; And through thy knowledge shall the weak brother perish, for whom Christ died? But when ye sin so against the brethren, and wound their weak conscience, ye sin against Christ. Wherefore, if meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend. (1 Corinthians 8:9-13.)

Brethren, let me urge all Christians to oppose dancing.  Let preachers preach against it; let elders uphold their hands in opposition to it.  Let us strive to be lights in a world of darkness.   

Think on these things.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                        The Informer

                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Vol. 68 No. 31

                                                                                                                                                                                                                        May 17, 2015

What the Bible Says About the Prom

 

I am aware that there are young people who every spring attend what is called the prom.  A few of these young people claim to follow Jesus Christ.  They were baptized into Christ and attend the services of the church regularly; yet I hear of their having gone to the prom with some handsome young man or some pretty girl.  Even some adults who long ago were taught differently see nothing wrong with their going to a dance.  More and more I am hearing of weddings in which both bride and groom claim to be Christians, but will have a dance at their wedding reception. So, what does the Bible say about the prom and other occasions where there is dancing?

One can read his Bible from the table of contents to the maps and will find not one time the word prom is used.  I do not even think it can be found in the modern versions which are out there.  So, how can one say that the Bible condones or condemns the custom of young people’s going to the prom in the spring? After all, do not the schools sponsors such activities?  Are not they chaperoned by teachers and adults? 

Let us think for a moment on this matter.  Does the Bible have to specifically condemn an action in order for it to be condemned?  For instance, does the Bible say that the use of heroine is wrong?  Does the Bible specifically say that it is sinful for a girl to wear a bikini at the beach or other public places?  Does the Bible specifically say that it is sinful to drink Jack Daniels or some other kind of whiskey?  We can answer with a resounding NO to each of these questions; however that does not make the action acceptable to God. 

The Bible is a book of principles.  Just think how large the book would be if it specifically mentioned all of the things one should not do.  Why the world could not contain the whole.  So, back to question:  What does the Bible say about the prom or other dances?

There is one word in the New Testament which condemns the prom.  The apostle Paul wrote to the churches of Galatia these words:

This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh. For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would. But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law. Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. (Gal. 5 16-21).

I put in bold and in italics the word I would like for you to consider.  The word is translated from the Greek word ἀσέλγεια which is defined as “unbridled lust, excess, licentiousness, lasciviousness, wantonness, outrageousness, shamelessness, insolence….wanton (acts or) manners, as filthy words, indecent physical movements, unchaste handling of males and females, etc.” (Thayer's Greek Lexicon.) Another source defines the word as “unrestrained living, unbridled acts of indecency which shock the public.” (Rienecker and Rogers, Linguistic Key to the Greek New Testament, p. 517.)  These are enough to show that the prom fits under the definition of the word lasciviousness. Why would a godly girl want a boy to put his hands all over her?  Why would a young Christian man want to put himself in such a vulnerable position?

Immodesty also accompanies the prom.  Dresses that are strapless, low-cut in front and/or back, a long slit up the side of the dress, etc. do not depict a woman’s professing godliness with good works.  Paul told the young man Timothy “Keep thyself pure.” (I Tim. 5:22.)  That is not easy in this modern age.  The word pure means “pure from carnality, chaste, modest; pure from every fault, immaculate.” (Strong’s Dictionary.)  How can a man keep his mind pure under such circumstances?  If he is normal, he cannot. Yet Jesus said, “But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.”  (Matt. 5:28).  Someone says:  “Well, he should not have such thoughts.”  No doubt; but men more so than women, are aroused sexually by what they see. And the world knows this. And women know this. So women are advertising.   

So, ladies, what are you advertising?  What do men see when they see you?  Do they see godliness, purity and Christian virtue?  Or do they see a woman dressed as a harlot (Gen. 38:14-15; Prov. 7:10).  Why then would a young lady, claiming to be a Christian, want to cause a man to have such thoughts?  She is partly to blame for his sin. That does not relieve him, but it certainly condemns her too.   

It is argued that there are adult chaperones at the prom.  Certainly, but they are carnal.  They have no interest in spiritual matters or they would not be there. Even when there are adults present, they find it impossible to control the indecent bodily movements of the attendees.  Almost fifteen years ago there was a term used called “freaking” or grinding defined as “a type of partner dance where two or more individuals gyrate their bodies against each other.”  Some schools began to draft”…rules on hand and thrust placement (like ‘no bending past a 45 degree angle’ at Wash. state’s Puyallup H.S.). ‘Not all freaking is banned’ at Santa Cruz (Calif.) High, just ‘sexually explicit dancing.’ That clears it all up.” (Newsweek, March 19, 2001, p. 8.) A few years ago at the middle school where my wife taught, the principal stopped all school dances, because the kids were so vulgar in their dancing. This was middle school!  I applauded that principal.  Too bad we do not have more of his kind. 

One of the saddest things about our young people’s going to the proms and dances is that parents encourage it!  Can you believe that?  Absolutely.  When I started my first local work in northern Indiana, I preached a blistering sermon against dancing, specifically against one’s going to the prom.  A young man came forward and confessed wrong.  He had planned to go to the prom; but after my lesson, he changed his mind.  However when he got home, his parents, who claimed to be Christians, encouraged him to go.  So, he went. They said that he might be able to influence the girl to become a Christian!  What a joke.  I very seriously doubt that the young man was trying to convert the young lady to Christ while dancing with her.

Someone says, “Well, I am not going to dance; but am going, only as a spectator.”  Yes, Herod was a spectator, too.    Herodias’ daughter danced before him and pleased him.  He was so pleased, he offered up to the half of his kingdom to her. Herodias had told her daughter to ask for the head of John the Baptist.  I wonder what there was about her dancing that caused the old man to be pleased?  If Herod enjoyed the dancing of the young lady, what about young men watching young ladies dance? 

So, Christian young man or lady, do not go to the prom.  The Bible condemns it; your mind and body may be polluted by it; your influence will be hurt by going to it. Do not go; be a Christian.

                                                                                                THE INFORMER

                                                                                                Vol. 68      No. 30

                                                                                                 May 10, 2015 

 

  

Human Nakedness and Leviticus 18

By John Chowning

 

     In our day of incessant immodesty and rampant pornography, it is pretty obvious that a multitude of people have never read or heeded Leviticus 18.  According to 1 Corinthians 10:11, this chapter—like all of its Old Testament colleagues—was written for our admonition (KJV), instruction (ESV).  Discovering and heeding the eternal principles of holiness, righteousness, and godliness that this passage contains will help make one wise unto salvation (2 Timothy 3:15).

     Because of the widespread unfamiliarity with this chapter, a little consideration of its context and contents is essential.  The book of Leviticus has an intense focus upon the holiness of the redeemed.  Consider Leviticus 11:45’s declaration:  “For I am the Lord your God who brings you up out of the land of Egypt, to be your God.  You shall be holy, for I am holy.”  A brief summary of the contents of verses 6-20 would be:  None of you shall approach anyone who is near of kin to him, to uncover his nakedness; I am the Lord.  The nakedness of your father you shall not uncover.  The nakedness of your mother you shall not uncover.  The nakedness of your father’s wife you shall not uncover.  The nakedness of your sister you shall not uncover.  The nakedness of your stepsister you shall not uncover.  The nakedness of our granddaughter you shall not uncover.  The nakedness of your half-sister you shall not uncover.  The nakedness of your aunt you shall not uncover.  The nakedness of your daughter-in-law you shall not uncover.  The nakedness of your sister-in-law you shall not uncover.  The nakedness of any woman and her daughter or granddaughter you shall not uncover.  The nakedness of a woman and her sister you shall not uncover.  Also, you shall not lie carnally with your neighbor’s wife, to defile yourself with her.

     Most of my adult life I have accepted the commonly given explanation of “uncovering the nakedness of” to be a Hebrew euphemism for sexual intercourse. Read almost any commentary that addresses this phrase and its intended meaning and this is the explanation you will find.  I now have some serious doubts about this explanation.  First of all, what is there in the context of the usage of this phrase in Leviticus 18 that would necessitate a non-literal understanding of the words?  A standard principle of Bible interpretation is that every narrative should be understood literally unless there is compelling contextual evidence that it should be understood in a non-literal way.  What is the compelling evidence for this phrase to be understood idiomatically?   In addition, note carefully that the language in the context--“You shall not lie carnally (literally—“lie with semen”) with your neighbor’s wife”—in verse 20 is different than verses 6-19’s uncovering the nakedness.  While it is possible that these two phrases have the same meaning, isn’t it equally (if not more) likely that they have different intended meanings?  Leviticus 20:18 definitely appears to support this conclusion because it addresses a situation in which a man lies with a woman and uncovers her nakedness.  The conclusion that I have reached is that a person can uncover another’s nakedness without committing fornication; however, a person cannot commit fornication without uncovering another’s nakedness.  Though they are closely connected, uncovering another’s nakedness is not synonymous with the act of fornication.   

     With this in mind, consider the impact of what the Scriptures are admonishing/instructing:  First, the Scriptures are instructing us that one’s nakedness—whether male or female—is a private matter and must be kept that way.  Modesty in dress, even when only family is around, is not an optional matter for those professing godliness. 

     Second, the Scriptures are instructing us that a woman’s nakedness is no man’s business except for her husband’s.  Of extreme importance here is Leviticus 20:21—“If a man takes his brother’s wife, it is an unclean thing.  He has uncovered his brother’s (emphasis added—jc) nakedness.  They shall be childless.”  Note the fact that in this illicit scenario, the adulterer has taken from his brother something that had rightfully belonged to the brother—the nakedness of his own wife.  One of the many evils that adultery perpetrates on the innocent mate is the violation that is felt because his/her exclusive marital right to a mate’s nakedness has been stolen.

     Third, because the Scriptures are instructing us that a person’s nakedness belongs to only one person—his/her spouse, even if a woman chooses to display her nakedness, it is sinful for any man beside her husband to be looking at it.  This is one of the reasons why pornography is sinful.  Just because a woman wants to do something that is unauthorized by God (like Potiphar’s wife did with Joseph) does not mean that a man’s obligation to rebuff her sinful intentions is nullified.  While our media is awash with multitudes of women who want to display some, most, or all of their nakedness, it does not mean that a man is innocent should he decide to provide her with an audience.  This fact has been true since the days of Noah (cf. Genesis 9:20-25)!  Joseph’s solution on such occasions remains the best—get away from it as fast as you can (Genesis 39:13).  

     In our crooked and perverse generation, the principles concerning human nakedness found in Leviticus 18 will sound outrageously offensive, just like they did to some in Moses’ generation.  However, the timeless principle that human culture does not determine God’s holy standards of modesty and morality remains.  Because a Christian has been redeemed from the bondage of sin, God’s New Testament expectation still is:  “as obedient children, not conforming yourselves to the former lusts, as in your ignorance; but as He who called you is holy, you also be holy in all your conduct, because it is written, ‘Be holy, for I am holy.’” (1 Peter 1:14-16).