From a Doctor's Perspective

The following comes from David, B. Wilhelm, MD. He wrote concerning the churches’ deciding to suspend services. David’s father, Jack Wilhelm, was a longtime gospel preacher.

Dr. David Wilhelm wrote:

"Since I know many people are struggling with the concept of "missing church services," let me say I understand. I grew up as a preacher's kid in Alabama in the 1970's, so believe me. I understand. "But allow me to offer a little perspective on the common ground where science and scripture intersect, giving us direction in our decision making during this time of anxiety.

Remember that Jehovah God was and is a God of quarantine in times of illness, even before we had the ability to understand why.

Numbers 5:2 outlines an isolation protocol for lepers and those who contacted a dead body.

Leviticus 14:36 states those with infection were labeled unclean and sent to live outside the camp.

Leviticus 13:4 gives directions for dealing with apparent staph skin infections, before anyone could have possibly known what that was.

The bottom line is, God knew the value of quarantine and gave us no less than 16 examples of when this is appropriate. It is certainly not unscriptural to follow His blueprint and take steps to ensure our physical health and safety, regardless of our religious beliefs.

Please be safe people. And remember, the quarantine may not ultimately change the number of viral infections, but it may spread them out long enough to keep our hospitals from being overrun with more patients than we can handle.”

Meeting in Our Homes

The Mayor of Indianapolis has placed travel restrictions on those in Marion County, Indiana.  All non-essential travel is discouraged.  The Federal Government has recommended that no group of more than ten gather. These restrictions and recommendations are given to try to slow down the coronavirus that is affecting people in this country. This is especially beneficial to the 60 and older group who may or may not have underlying health issues. It is also to encouraged that the younger people try not to be carriers of that which may harm others.   

Even if these recommendations are changed to restrictive laws, should Christians violate these laws? Do these laws go contrary to God’s law to assemble with the saints on the Lord’s day? We certainly ought to obey God rather than man (Acts 5:29). But if these recommendations are made laws, would Christians be wrong to violate them in order to assemble? 

First, Christians are commanded to meet together to worship on the Lord’s day. However, Christians can still meet in small groups of fewer than ten to carry out the command to assemble. Some early churches met in the homes of individuals to worship (Acts 12:12; Rom. 16:3-5; 1 Cor. 16:19). The recommendation/law does not prohibit Christians from assembling to worship in small groups. If it did, then we would have to obey heaven’s law rather than man’s law.  A small group can carry out all the acts of worship – singing, praying, studying, observing the Lord’s supper and giving just as the Lord teaches.  We hope that this arrangement does not last long, but we do not know. 

Second, the observance of meeting in groups of ten or fewer is practicing the Golden Rule
(Matt. 7:12). In consideration of my brothers and sisters in Christ and my fellowman, I should not gather in a large crowd (John 13:34-35). If I were a carrier of the virus and did not know it, I could pass it on to someone else who has underlying health issues and cause him or her to contract the virus. Out of love for my fellowman, I should be responsible enough to avoid being in a large crowd or traveling when not necessary (Matt. 22:39). 

Third, it is rendering “unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s; and unto to God the
things that are God’s” to observe these recommendations (Matt. 22:21). We are to be subject unto the powers that be (Rom. 13:1-7). The government, having been ordained of God, is for the punishment of evil doers and the praise of them who do well (1 Peter 2:14). In this case, it is for our good that we adhere to the recommendations of the government. 

Fourth, John wrote, “Beloved, I wish above all things that thou mayest prosper and be in health, even as thy soul prospereth.” (3 John 2.) John was concerned for the overall being of Gaius – his fiscal well-being, his physical well-being and his spiritual well-being. We, also, should be concerned for every member of the body of Christ, especially the family of God at Shelbyville Road here in Indianapolis. During these trying times, we encourage all members to keep in touch with each other by whatever means one has at his disposal. The writer of Hebrews said, “But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin” (Heb. 3:13.)

Fifth, there were trying circumstances for those Christians in the early years of the church. Due to persecutions, they had to meet secretly or privately. In fact, today in China it against the law for Christians to meet; so, they have to meet secretly to carry out the Lord’s will.  Paul said, “I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me” (Phil. 4:13.)  With Lord’s help, we can get through this. Often men leading prayers in our assemblies will thank our heavenly Father for our being able to assemble without fear of molestation or attack.  We pray that soon we can again express our thanks for the Lord’s allowing us to come together as God’s family at Shelbyville Road.  Pray for our country, and that this virus might be defeated. Pray for every member of the household of faith.  Pray for the sick that God’s healing hand will be with them. Keep in touch. 

God Hates Putting Away

Malachi prophesied after the Jews returned from seventy years of exile.  His book  by the same name seals the Old Testament; that is, it is the last of the Old Testament books, both in Hebrews’ Bible, as well as our English Bible. The old “rabbis referred to Malachi as ‘the seal of the prophets.’”  (Layman’s Bible Book Commentary, Vol. 14, p.147).  As one reads this short book of four chapters, he observes a pattern of charges made by God and the people’s responses. In the middle of this book we find these words:

 

Yet ye say, Wherefore? Because the Lord hath been witness between thee and the wife of thy youth, against whom thou hast dealt treacherously: yet is she thy companion, and the wife of thy covenant. And did not he make one? Yet had he the residue of the spirit. And wherefore one? That he might seek a godly seed. Therefore take heed to your spirit, and let none deal treacherously against the wife of his youth. For the Lord, the God of Israel, saith that he hateth putting away: for one covereth violence with his garment, saith the Lord of hosts: therefore take heed to your spirit, that ye deal not treacherously. (Malachi 2:14-16.)

 

The preceding commentary to which I alluded has some fine points in this section of Scripture.  Thus, I am giving them as they are for the benefit of us all:

Jewish men were divorcing their Jewish wives and remarrying pagan women from the surrounding nations.  This was not only an act of treachery against their first wives but also a threat to Israel’s very existence as a nation.  They were in danger of being absorbed by the heathen nations around them.  Malachi reminded them that all Israelites had God as their Father and Creator and so were obligated to treat each other as brothers and sisters (v. 10).  Instead, the very opposite had taken place in Judah.  The men of Judah had profaned everything that was sacred by marrying women who were devotees of foreign gods (v. 11).  A curse should fall upon anyone’s doing such an abominable thing (v. 12). 

Marital problems always affect a person’s spiritual life.  It is impossible for a man to be on good terms with the Lord if there is constant bickering and tension between him and his wife; and the reverse is also true.  The Jews who were marrying pagan women could not understand why the Lord no longer accepted their sacrifices with favor (v. 13).

The reason should have been clear to them.  They had not only married idolatrous women but had also dealt treacherously with their Jewish wives, divorcing them and sending them away because they were no longer young and attractive (v. 14).  There was no sadder plight in the ancient world than that of the cast-off wife.

Only here in the Old Testament is the word “companion” applied to the relationship of a man to a woman.  Elsewhere it is restricted to the relationship of a man to his male companions or friends.  This shows the high regard with which Malachi viewed the marriage relationship.  A man’s wife was his companion and as such she had rights that were not to be violated.

The wife who was being divorced is also described as “your wife by covenant” [KJV – “the wife of thy covenant”] (v.14).  This meant that God took the marriage vows seriously, although the husband obviously did not.  When marriage vows are exchanged, a solemn covenant is established and those breaking them must answer to God. [It is a covenant of three:  God, the man and the woman. BFV.]

The translation of verse 15 in the Revised Standard Version obscures its meaning.  Space does not permit a detailed explanation of its problems but let me paraphrase it as I think it ought to be interpreted:  ‘Did not God make one man and one woman in the beginning, although he had power to do otherwise?  And why did he make but one man and one woman?  It was that they might produce godly offspring, a goal that is severely limited whenever divorce takes place.” If this interpretation is correct, Malachi was basing his opposition to divorce on the Genesis account of creation.  Christ also did this when the Pharisees questioned him on the subject of divorce (see Matt. 19:4-6).

The climatic statement on this subject comes in verse 16:  “For I hate divorce, says the Lord God of Israel.”  To sum up, what does the passage teach us about divorce?  (1)  It is the violation of a covenant that has God as its witness.  (2)  It often involves cruelty and treachery on the part of the marriage partners toward each other.  (3)  It defeats God’s purpose to establish the home as a place where godly children may be reared. (4) For these and other reasons, divorce is wrong, and God hates it.  We also should hate it and do all we can to prevent it.  At the same time, we should show love and compassion toward those who have experienced divorce, especially those who have been victimized by it.  God hates divorce but still loves divorced persons. I’m not sure the same could be said for all of our churches. (Page H. Kelley,  Layman’s Bible Book  Commentary, Vol. 14, pp. 154-155.)

Since God changes not, He still hates divorce. Some other reasons as to why He hates it are:  (1)  Divorce weakens the church spiritually; (2) It leads to a domino effect, or a little leaven leavens the whole lump; (3) It affects children for a lifetime. Thus, we should do all within our power to prevent divorce.

Brethren who have an affectionate attachment to the English Standard Version need to be aware that it really botches up the translation of Malachi 2:16.  It renders the verse this way:  “For the man who hates and divorces, says the Lord, the God of Israel, covers his garment with violence, says the Lord of hosts. So guard yourselves in your spirit, and do not be faithless.”  Did you notice that it removes from the verse God’s attitude toward divorce?  The King James Version rightly renders it:  “For the Lord, the God of Israel, saith that he hateth putting away…. “Though men need to hate divorce, it is God in this verse who is depicted as hating divorce.

               

                                                                                                                                THE INFORMER

                                                                                                                                Vol. 68  No. 19